Skip to main content

Step three: let it flow.

I wonder how much different my thoughts are from those around me. Do we all ponder the same general questions? Of is the human experience so unique that we will always struggle to relate with one another. I guess relating would still be difficult if we are thinking about the same stuff or not. Do we really value empathy as a society? And if we do, how much thought do we give toward it at an individual level? Do people even want to make thinking about how other people feel a priority? I sure hope so. If not, I don't see how we will ever make progress as a species. 

Perhaps we just don't have the technology to communicate our thoughts with each other effectively. But that can't be it, we've been able to write letters to each other for centuries and have been able to communicate electronically for decades. 

People must really just not care enough about each other to stay in touch. But that makes sense in a way. People change, priorities change, and so the people we stay close to must naturally change. Accepting that change is probably the hardest part. Relationships are a two way street, and you can't get somebody to come to you if they don't want to, no matter how much effort you put into it. 

Mutual reciprocity must be where we find our worth to others. Some people look at the willingness to put more into a relationship than another person as a weakness, like it means you're needy, but I don't think that's true. If I were needy I would need them to put more in than I do. I hope I'm always willing to take a friendship deeper if someone wants it. I don't know how to make sure I'm picking up on that, but maybe all I have to do is ask, or better yet listen.

I wonder if I don't listen enough. I feel like I talk a lot, and I'm trying to get other people to talk back, but I hope people don't think I just want them to be sounding boards. I want a real response, I want to be corrected when my ideas aren't congruent with my principles. What are my principles these days? 

My top priority has to be love. It's really the most beautiful concept in existence. Unconditional love exceptionally so. That's a hard one, but I think it's the deepest form of care you can have for somebody. Families should really work on unconditionally loving each other more. It's good practice, and the people tend to be worth it. Where to draw the line between love and allowing yourself to be used is tricky, but I think it's worth it to take the risk. I mean, when you look back will you really be sad that you loved somebody too much? Is that really something to be ashamed of or regret? Not at all.

I wonder how I can love everyone in my life more. I have to be honest with them. I think love can't function without honesty. Oh the power truth has. And how sad it is that people are scared of it and others try to hide it. It's very liberating when you can just live honestly, and be open with everyone. Sure, tact has its place, but honesty is what will lead you to solving your problems the soonest. 

You really can't learn if you don't have access to truth. That's what's so great about logic. It helps you recognize truth. I hope people can see that logic and emotion don't have to conflict one another. Sometimes they do, but if you're willing to slow down and let your emotions be logical, I find it to be very pleasant. There's a peace to be found by seeking logical emotion. I feel like life is the struggle to find that peace.

May we continue to let the truth set us free.


Popular posts from this blog

An Unapologetic Paraphrasing of Bastiat's Apology for Landed Property

This is my admittedly snarky paraphrasing of Bastiat's rambling apology on Landed Property in his Economic Harmonies . I think by translating the verbiage into modern terms, which I couldn't help but do so with a pinch of sarcasm, it becomes clear he didn't prove much of anything at all. Instead, a reader feels underwhelmed by its points and overwhelmed by the verbosity of his rather banal parables. Even though he shows what actually causes land to increase in value when he describes the improvements of a city/town growing around land, he insists that all the gained value obtained by landlords by that mechanism is actually just the fruits of their past labors, ignoring his own supposition that value comes from the service provided, in the case of Land, by a better site to occupy, not labor. If it pleases you, enjoy the following: The economists of all sorts say that landlord's charge rent for value they did not create. Most say it is unjust, but some begrudgingly ad

Free Land, or the ideal mean for a Location Value funded Citizen's Dividend

If we want to liberate ourselves from one another, we can buy into the idea that we can more effectively share this planet. We can do so for the purposes of maximizing human autonomy and the experience of equal liberty for every citizen of the Earth, through each of their local communities. We have the means today to voluntarily buy into a federation of neighborhood scale land trusts with a global reach. Existentially, our birthrights are the greatest lottery of all of history. We can make that a game with winning odds for everyone. The desire to be free, to choose to live how we each wish to live, is strongly felt within each of us. But those who experience it most, unfortunately, value it least. They become so accustomed to protecting or jealously expanding their own experience of it that they have created a system of enforcing their own privileges at the cost of others. I believe all people ought to choose whosoever's service they wish to enter, but I do not believe any of

Our Dancing Universe: the Word and the Circle of Light.

The Word lets light and begets all things. I have composed the following in awe of the beauty and balance of our cosmos. It is based off of concepts connected by three pieces of scientific literature. The summary of each is as follows: 1. "A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter: Negative masses and matter creation within a modified ΛCDM framework" describes how the existence of a negative mass fluid would result in the orientation and behavior of the cosmos as we observe it, removing the need for the hypothetical notions of dark matter and dark energy to describe the shapes of galaxies and the observed expansion of space-time. 2. "Negative-Mass Hydrodynamics in a Spin-Orbit–Coupled Bose-Einstein Condensate" describes how when matter gets extremely cold, approximately absolute zero, atoms condense into a collective fluid that behaves as if it has negative mass. 3. "On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton" describes how gravity itself i