Skip to main content

whose side are you on?

The starving of hostages is atrocious, but I am curious, would you be more enraged over it if the Israelis did this to a Palestinian captive, all the while Palestinians were actively driving Israel out of Jerusalem with the use of the sort of overwhelming military force that Israel is using today? Imagine if the U.S. supported Palestine instead. How would you feel?

I can't think of the ongoing atrocities in that region without thinking of Bob Dylan's, "With God on Our Side," and wonder, why didn't God just do this to the Romans, if it was truly the way he wanted the Holy Land reclaimed in the name of his chosen people. It is hard to imagine a more arrogant and solipsistic claim that a people could make. I get it, it is quite a rhetorical device, but quite unknowable and beyond proof to the point of absurdity if you examine it closely and don't just, "take it on faith," that God cares about some peoples more than others.

If you believe the Palestinians are terrorized by their own State, made into victims by their own leaders, brainwashed into supporting it, where do you question the reverse? Where do you begin to question the tactics of Israel to secure victory, and question their definition of a just war? Because if peace is only secured through eradication, through treating the Palestinians like they are vermin, the Israeli ethnostate is possibly the scariest Nation-State example of the abused becoming the abusers in recent history, especially as an American, viewing the U.S. as its enabler.

And I'm sure you will have plenty of apologetics for it, and I'm sure you can defend it with the Old Testament. I trust your logic in doing so will be valid as you know this area of the world, its recent history, and Scripture much better than I do - but I am really struggling to see any form of good arising from the ongoing evils in that part of the globe. Even if this is the extermination of a terrorist state, and the exile of a captive population, and this is history repeating itself in some form - it is blatantly obvious that it has nothing to do with justice.

How much are American corporations making off of every bomb dropped? Off of all of the fuel for the carnage? How much do developers stand to make in reconstruction, development, and privatization of that prime real estate? And those concentrated profits are all funded by the socialized debt carried by our financial system, which has weaponized the constitutional system of our mutual defense into an apparatus for its monetary and proprietary hegemony. But I'm sure all that is just convenient coincidence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Unapologetic Paraphrasing of Bastiat's Apology for Landed Property

This is my admittedly snarky paraphrasing of Bastiat's rambling apology on Landed Property in his Economic Harmonies . I think by translating the verbiage into modern terms, which I couldn't help but do so with a pinch of sarcasm, it becomes clear he didn't prove much of anything at all. Instead, a reader feels underwhelmed by its points and overwhelmed by the verbosity of his rather banal parables. Even though he shows what actually causes land to increase in value when he describes the improvements of a city/town growing around land, he insists that all the gained value obtained by landlords by that mechanism is actually just the fruits of their past labors, ignoring his own supposition that value comes from the service provided, in the case of Land, by a better site to occupy, not labor. If it pleases you, enjoy the following: The economists of all sorts say that landlord's charge rent for value they did not create. Most say it is unjust, but some begrudgingly ad...
Post a Comment
Read more

effortless existence excels at execution

if you allow yourself to produce without judgment of the product the product forms without strain as the production itself releases it if you allow yourself to breathe without fighting for air the breath fills you without pain as the breath itself inspires you if you allow yourself to be without chasing after desires the desires arise organically as the desires will be if you allow yourself to think simply without overcomplicating matters the simplicity will navigate all complexities as the simplicity is the solution
Post a Comment
Read more

Yay Anxiety!

I gave you more than you asked to receive. I misinterpreted you sharing as a desire to feel care through the expression of understanding and thought of you. The distance between us is too broad of an expanse for you to expend the energy to keep in touch.  I get it. I don't agree with it, but I accept it. I don't need to convince you otherwise. Knowing you this briefly has taught me what a longer connection never could. Vision taught me that a thing isn't beautiful because it lasts. It's a simple truth, but it resonates. I wish it wasn't over, but I also see that it is better for me in ways that it ended so quick. What do we owe one another? You told me it amounts to nothing. I think you're right, but I think you missed that a good relationship is never owed. We choose it. It's a verb we do because we want it. It's not about debts to be served, but service freely given. Or maybe you already know that and just don't want to give any more. Thank you for...
Post a Comment
Read more